首页> 外文OA文献 >Evolution of the Mongol-Okhotsk ocean as constrained by new palaeomagnetic data from the Mongol-Okhotsk suture zone, Siberia
【2h】

Evolution of the Mongol-Okhotsk ocean as constrained by new palaeomagnetic data from the Mongol-Okhotsk suture zone, Siberia

机译:受来自西伯利亚蒙古-鄂霍次克缝合线的新古地磁数据的约束,蒙古-鄂霍次克海的演化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper presents new data from palaeomagnetic investigations on the Upper Palaeozoic and Mesozoic geological units from the Siberian platform and the Mongol-Okhotsk suture zone. Within the southern portion of the Mongol-Okhotsk suture we collected palaeomagnetic samples from the Late Permian Belektuy formation (Borzya region; 50.7°N, 116.9°E) and the Middle-Late Jurassic Shadaron formation (Unda-Daya; 51.5°N, 117.5°E). We sampled the Late Permian Alentuy formation (Khilok region; 50.8°N, 107.2°E), the Early to Middle Jurassic Irkutsk sedimentary basin (ISB; 52.0°N, 104.0°E), the Late Jurassic Badin formation (Mogzon region; 51.8°N, 112.0°E), and the Early Cretaceous Gusinoozesk formation (Gusinoc Lake region; 51.2°N, 106.5°E) additionally in the northern region of the Mongol-Okhotsk suture. Apart from the results of the ISB and Gusinoozersk formations, which show very large ellipses of confidence and might be the present-day geomagnetic field overprint, our resu lts allow us to constrain the evolution of the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean palaeomagnetically from the Late Permian to the Middle-Late Jurassic. They confirm that this large Permian ocean closed during the Jurassic, ending up in the late Jurassic or the beginning of the Cretaceous in the eastern end of the suture zone, as suspected on geological grounds. However, although geological data suggest a Middle Jurassic closure of the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean in the west Trans-Baikal region, our data show evidence of a still large palaeolatitude difference between the Amuria and Siberia blocks. This is interpreted as a result of the quite fast closure of the ocean after the Middle Jurassic. Finally, our new palaeomagnetic results exhibit very large tectonic rotations around local vertical axes, which we interpret as probably arising both from collision processes and from a left-lateral shear movement along the suture zone, due to the eastward extrusion of Mongolia under the effect of the collision of India into Asia.
机译:本文介绍了来自西伯利亚平台和蒙古-鄂霍次克缝合带的上古生界和中生代地质单元古地磁研究的新数据。在蒙古-鄂霍次克缝合线的南部,我们从二叠纪晚Belektuy组(Borzya地区;北纬50.7°,东经116.9°)和侏罗纪中晚期Shadaron组(Unda-Daya;北纬51.5°,北经117.5)收集了古磁性样品。 °E)。我们采样了二叠纪晚期的Alentuy地层(Khilok地区; 50.8°N,107.2°E),侏罗纪早期至中期的伊尔库茨克沉积盆地(ISB; 52.0°N,104.0°E),侏罗纪的巴丁晚期地层(Mogzon地区; 51.8) °N,112.0°E),以及蒙古-鄂霍次克缝合线北部的早白垩纪古西诺兹克组(Gusinoc Lake地区; 51.2°N,106.5°E)。 ISB和Gusinoozersk地层的结果显示出非常大的信心椭圆,并且可能是当今的地磁场叠印,我们的结果使我们能够限制蒙古-鄂霍次克海古地磁从二叠纪晚期到第二纪的演化。中侏罗纪。他们证实,由于地质原因,二叠纪大洋在侏罗纪期间关闭,最终在侏罗纪晚期或缝合带东端的白垩纪开始。但是,尽管地质数据表明,西贝加尔河西岸地区的蒙古-鄂霍次克海处于侏罗纪中期封闭,但我们的数据显示,阿穆里亚和西伯利亚地块之间的古纬度差异仍然很大。这被解释为侏罗纪中期之后海洋迅速封闭的结果。最后,我们的新古地磁结果显示出围绕局部垂直轴的很大的构造旋转,我们认为这可能是由于碰撞过程和沿缝线区域的左向剪切运动造成的,这是由于蒙古的东向挤压在印度与亚洲的碰撞。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号